1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
STATE OF NEW YORK,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S.
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
ENFORCEMENT; CHAD F. WOLF,
in his official capacity as Acting
Secretary of
Homeland Security; and
MATTHEW ALBENCE,
in his official
capacity as Acting Director of U
nited
S
tates Immigration and Customs
Enforcement,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
INTRODUCTION
1. This lawsuit challenges the federal government’s policy that unlawfully prevents
international students from maintaining F-1 and M-1 student visas if they are enrolled in an
online-only course of study for the fall 2020 semester.
2. Following the World Health Organization (“WHO”)’s designation of the
coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International
Concern on January 30, 2020,
1
our nation has gone to extraordinary lengths to combat the
COVID-19 epidemic and promote public health.
1
Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, New ICD-10-CM code for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-
19) (Apr. 1, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/Announcement-New-ICD-code-for-coronavirus-3-
18-2020.pdf
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 27
2
3. Days before the WHO declared COVID-19 a global pandemic,
2
on March 7,
2020, the New York Governor Andrew Cuomo declared a state of emergency to address the
threat that COVID-19 posed to the health and welfare of New York’s residents and visitors.
State of N.Y. Exec. Order 202, Declaring a Disaster Emergency in the State of New York (Mar.
7, 2020). And on March 13, 2020, the President declared a national emergency to contain and
combat the virus in the United States. Proclamation 9994 of Mar. 13, 2020, Declaring a
National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak, 85 Fed.
Reg. 15,337 (Mar. 18, 2020).
4. Because the coronavirus is an airborne disease that is most easily transmitted
through close face-to-face contact, minimizing in-person gatherings and maximizing social
distancing have proven to be integral components of coronavirus mitigation.
5. To that end, New York’s postsecondary institutions have devoted significant
resources towards continuing the education of millions of students while safeguarding the public
health, including by closing nearly every college and university as of late March 2020, shifting to
remote teaching and learning, implementing measures to keep school campuses safe, and
diverting limited financial resources to the COVID-19 response.
6. In recognition of the near universal transition to remote learning in New York and
across the country, on March 13, 2020, the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(“ICE”), a sub-agency of the Department of Homeland Security, issued a waiver to agency
regulations that required noncitizens on F-1 and M-1 student visas to attend a majority of their
2
Id.
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 2 of 27
3
classes in person. ICE’s directive was issued due to “the extraordinary nature of the COVID-19
emergency,” and was to remain in “effect for the duration of the emergency.”
3
7. Arbitrarily and without notice, ICE issued a Broadcast Message on COVID-19
4
and fall 2020 (“the Directive”) on July 6, 2020 announcing that it would rescind its March 13,
2020 waiver, thereby requiring all international students on F-1 and M-1 visas to either enroll in
in-person classes for the fall 2020 semester or immediately depart the country. Students on F-1
and M-1 visas currently outside of the United States are now barred from reentering if their
schools offer online-only instruction for the fall. ICE’s new Directive also requires schools
offering online-only instructions to submit an “operational change plan” no later than
Wednesday, July 15, 2020. Universities that offer a hybrid of online and in-person courses must
certify for each international student that their “program is not entirely online, that the student is
not taking an entirely online course load for the fall 2020 semester, and that the student is taking
the minimum number of online classes required to make normal progress in their degree
program,” and issue new Form I-20s for all of these students by August 4, 2020.
8. ICE’s rescission comes amid record-setting COVID-19 infection rates. As of July
13, 2020, over 3 million Americans have tested positive for coronavirus, and over 132,000 died
of COVID-19 and related illnesses.
5
In New York, over 406,000 people have tested positive for
coronavirus, and over 32,000 have died. These statistics – and the resulting devastation – are
3
U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, COVID-19: Guidance for SEVP Stakeholders (Mar. 13,
2020),
https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Document/2020/Coronavirus%20Guidance_3.13.20.pdf
4
U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Broadcast Message: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-
19) and Potential Procedural Adaptations for F and M nonimmigrant students (Mar. 9, 2020),
https://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/bcm2003-01.pdf
5
Christopher Weber and Sophia Tulp, Confirmed Coronavirus Cases in the U.S. hit 3 Million
and Climbing, ABC News (Jul. 8, 2020), https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/australia-
isolates-virus-prone-state-serbs-oppose-lockdown-71664928
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 3 of 27
4
exponentially higher as compared to when ICE initially issued its “emergency” student visa
waiver in mid-March.
9. ICE’s Directive is in line with the federal administration’s stated goal of quickly
re-opening schools, callously ignoring prevailing public health guidelines calling for sustained
social distancing and tailored reopening plans of only the most essential activities.
10. ICE’s rash and ill-informed decision to promote school re-openings not only
endangers the public health, but also threatens the immigration status of the over 100,000
international students who study in New York each year, many of whom may not be able to
secure enrollment in compliant educational programs by the Directive’s August 4 deadline.
11. ICEs Directive will cause immediate, irreparable, and ongoing harm to New
York, its educational institutions, and its residents. The Directive’s true mandate to increase
in-person instruction – runs counter to public health guidelines and expertise, and would demand
that schools either reconfigure their fall 2020 course offerings in a matter of days, or risk
international students dis-enrollment. Implementing ICE’s Directive will drain and divert New
York’s limited educational resources, hinder the State’s effective administration and enforcement
of its own COVID-19 policies, result in millions in lost tuition and revenue, and jeopardize the
health and safety of all New Yorkers.
12. Defendants’ drastic and unreasonable departure from its prior COVID-19 student
visa policy violates the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) in several respects. First, the
Directive is arbitrary and capricious because it failed to consider the resulting harms to education
and public health, as well as the fact that the emergency which necessitated ICE’s March 13,
2020 waiverthe coronavirus pandemic – continues unabated to this day. Second, ICE failed to
engage in notice and comment rulemaking, or provide any modicum of notice, before enacting
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 4 of 27
5
these abrupt changes to its prior policy, upon which New York’s educational institutions, and
their international students, relied.
13. Plaintiff the State of New York brings this action to enjoin Defendants from
enforcing ICE’s July 6, 2020 Directive or promulgating it as a Temporary Final Rule because (a)
the Directive is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and otherwise not in accordance
with law under the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); and (b) Defendants failed to observe procedures
required by law in issuing the Directive in violation of the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(D).
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
14. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 2201(a).
Jurisdiction is also proper under the judicial review provisions of the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 702.
15. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)(2) and
1391(e)(1). Defendants are United States agencies or officers sued in their official capacities.
The State of New York is a resident of this judicial district, and a substantial part of the events or
omissions giving rise to this Complaint occurred within the Southern District of New York.
16. Declaratory and injunctive relief is sought consistent with 5 U.S.C. §§ 705 and
706, and as authorized in 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
PARTIES
17. The Plaintiff the State of New York, represented by and through its Attorney
General, is a sovereign state of the United States of America. The Attorney General is New
York State’s chief law enforcement officer and is authorized to pursue this action under N.Y.
Executive Law § 63.
18. Plaintiff is aggrieved by Defendants’ actions and has standing to bring this action
because DefendantsDirective harms or will harm its sovereign, quasi-sovereign, economic, and
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 5 of 27
6
proprietary interests and will continue to cause injury unless and until the Directive is vacated
and enjoined.
19. Defendant the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is a cabinet agency within
the executive branch of the United States government and is an agency within the meaning of 5
U.S.C. § 552(f). Its mandate includes the administration of the interior enforcement provisions
of the country’s immigration laws.
20. Defendant Chad F. Wolf is the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security. He is
sued in his official capacity.
21. Defendant U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a sub-agency of DHS.
ICE is responsible for the administration of the interior enforcement provisions of the country’s
immigration laws. ICE issued the Directive, and ICE is responsible for enforcing federal
immigration law, including identifying, apprehending, detaining, and removing non-citizens.
22. Defendant Matthew T. Albence is the Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement. He is sued in his official capacity.
ALLEGATIONS
I. The COVID-19 Pandemic.
23. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization designated the coronavirus
disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
On March 11, the WHO declared COVID-19 a global pandemic.
6
24. On March 7, 2020, the New York Governor Andrew Cuomo declared a state of
emergency to address the threat that COVID-19 poses to the health and welfare of New York’s
6
World Health Org., WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19
(Mar. 11, 2020), https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-
media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 6 of 27
7
residents and visitors. State of N.Y. Exec. Order 202, Declaring a Disaster Emergency in the
State of New York (Mar. 7, 2020). And on March 13, 2020, the President declared a national
emergency to contain and combat the virus in the United States. Proclamation 9994 of Mar. 13,
2020, Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
Outbreak, 85 Fed. Reg. 15,337 (Mar. 18, 2020).
25. For many, the virus can cause severe and life-threatening respiratory illness
marked by fever, coughing, and difficulty breathing. See Centers for Disease Control &
Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Frequently Asked Questions (internet) (last
updated Jul. 3, 2020).
7
The disease is spreading extensively in communities throughout the
country, with cases reported in all fifty states. See Centers for Disease Control & Prevention,
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Summary (internet) (last updated Jul. 11,
2020).
8
26. Public health experts have determined that COVID-19 is a respiratory disease,
and is most easily transmittable through close-contact inhalation. As such, public health experts
have strongly advised against indoor gatherings of any size.
27. The Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) has identified factors that contribute to
COVID-19 acceleration and issued corresponding guidance.
9
Among other factors, “large
gatherings” and “crowding and high population density” are identified as COVID-19
transmission accelerants. The CDC recommends “restricting mass gatherings; global travel
7
Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Frequently Asked
Questions (Updated Jul. 3, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/faq.html
8
Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Cases in the U.S.
(Updated Jul. 11, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/summary.html
9
Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Public Health Response to the Initiation and Spread of Pandemic
COVID-19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020 (May 8, 2020),
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6918e2.htm
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 7 of 27
8
restrictions and domestic travel recommendations, recommending transition to virtual events.”
10
(emphasis added) For “crowding and high population density,” the CDC recommends “stay-at-
home orders, recommendations for hand washing and social distancing, cloth face covering
guidance, school dismissals, extended telework, environmental surface cleaning.”
11
28. New York State, like many states, has enacted broad closures of businesses and
government offices, and mandated the cancellation of public events across all industries to
reduce face-to-face interactions and the resulting risk of coronavirus transmission.
12
New York
State is particularly concerned with minimizing the need for indoor in-person events.
13
29. Schools are no exception. As most college and university classroom settings
necessitate that students and instructors gather for extended periods of time indoors, and where
social distancing is not always feasible, remote learning is the most practicable way to minimize
the spread of coronavirus while providing continuous instruction.
30. As such, the majority of campuses in New York State have been closed since
March 2020, are engaged in remote teaching and learning, and are in the midst of developing
reopening plans for the fall 2020 semester.
14
10
Id.
11
Id.
12
Jasmine C. Lee, Sarah Mervosh, Yuriria Avila, Barbara Harvey, and Alex Leeds Matthews, See How
All 50 State Are Reopening, N.Y. Times (and Closing Again) (Updated Jul. 11, 2020),
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/states-reopen-map-coronavirus.html
13
Chas Danner, Matt Stied, and Adam K. Raymond, Everything We Do and Don’t Know About New
York’s Reopening, N.Y. Magazine (Updated Jul. 9, 2020),
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/when-will-new-york-reopen-phases-and-full-plan-
explained.html
14
Abigail Hess, How coronavirus dramatically changed college for over 14 million students, CNBC
(Mar. 26, 2020), https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/26/how-coronavirus-changedcollege-
for-over-14-million-students.html; Erica Schwiegershausen, When Will Schools Reopen?, The Cut (Jul. 9,
2020), https://www.thecut.com/2020/07/will-schools-open-in-the-fall-reopening-statuses-explained.html
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 8 of 27
9
31. While these measures are in effect, the United States has set new records for daily
coronavirus infections. As of July 13, 2020, over 3 million Americans have tested positive for
the coronavirus, and over 132,00 have died due to COVID-19 and related illnesses.
15
Recent
weeks have demonstrated that even modest loosening of coronavirus restrictions and social
distancing measures can have devastating consequences.
16
A. ICE’s Initial Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
32. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), a person applying for an F-1
visa must have “a residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning, [and
be] a bona fide student qualified to pursue a full course of study and who seeks to enter the
United States temporarily and solely for the purposes of pursuing such a course of study…at an
established college, university, seminary, conservatory, academic high school, elementary
school, or other academic institution.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(f).
33. A person seeking an M-1 vocational nonimmigrant visa must also have “a
residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning [and] seeks to enter the
United States temporarily and solely for the purpose of pursing such a course of study” at an
“established, approved educational institution.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(m).
34. Under the regulations implementing the INA’s F-1 and M-1 visa eligibility
requirements, a “full course of study” is twelve credit hours per academic term. Prior to ICE’s
March COVID-19 waiver, students on F-1 visas were allowed to enroll in online or remote
learning for “no more than the equivalent of one class or three credits per session, term,
15
Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count, N.Y. Times (last visited July 7, 2020)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html [https://perma.cc/25D3-
UPBH.]
16
U.S. Hits Another Record for New Coronavirus Cases, N.Y. Times, (Jul. 10, 2020),
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/09/world/coronavirus-updates.html
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 9 of 27
10
semester, trimester, or quarter. . ..8 C.F.R § 214.2(f)(6). Students were not permitted to use
any online or distance education course credits towards their M-1 visa status. 8 C.F.R.
§ 214.2(m)(9)(v).
35. The Student Exchange and Visitor Program (“SEVP) administers ICE’s F-1 and
M-1 regulations.
17
Under this program, schools must have a “designated school official”
(“DSO) or a “principal designated school official” (PDSO”) who is the point of contact for any
issue relating to the institution’s compliance with SEVP regulations. Periodically, schools must
also report certain information to SEVP through the Student and Exchange Visitor Information
System (SEVIS). Schools must provide confirmation that a student initially arrived in the United
States, confirmation that the student is active each semester, transfer information, changes in
students’ status, and general information regarding students’ employment, academic programs,
and dependents.
18
Once an international student is accepted into SEVP, a school issues a Form
I-20, Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status. Id.
36. On March 9, 2020, SEVP issued a Broadcast Message (“March 9 Broadcast)
advising SEVP-certified schools that they “may need to adapt their procedures and policies to
address the significant public health concerns associated with the COVID-19 crisis(appended
as Ex. 1). The March 9 Broadcast included SEVP reporting instructions crafted to address
“COVID-19 procedural adaptations to SEVP.” Through this March 9 Broadcast, SEVP
conveyed its intent on “ensuring that nonimmigrant students are able to continue to make normal
progress in full course of study as required by federal regulations.” SEVP also intended “to be
17
U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., STUDY in the STATES, SEVIS HELP HUB (last visited Jul. 12, 2020),
https://studyinthestates.dhs.gov/sevis-help-hub/school-records/school-certification/form-i-17-initial-
certification
18
U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, SEVIS Reporting Requirements for Designated School
Officials (last visited Jul. 12, 2020), https://www.ice.gov/sevis/dso-requirements
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 10 of 27
11
flexible with temporary adaptations” and understood that institutions may need “to comply with
state or local health emergency declarations.”
37. On March 13, 2020, SEVP, consistent with the intentions conveyed in its March 9
Broadcast and in recognition of the extraordinary threats that the COVID-19 pandemic presented
to in-person learning, issued guidance (the “March 13 Guidance”) exempting students from the
regulatory in-person learning requirements for the duration of the pandemic (appended as Ex. 2).
Specifically, the March 13 Guidance was issued in response to “inquiries concerning the proper
status” of international students in the United States on academic visas “who may have [to] face
slightly different scenarios related to emergency procedures implemented by SEVP-certified
learning institutions.”
38. The March 13 Guidance addresses the status of students whose “school
temporarily stops in-person classes but implements online or other alternate learning procedures
and the nonimmigrant student remains in the United States.” Id. Per this guidance, ICE
encouraged students in this situation to continue their studies by permitting them to “participate
in online or other alternative learning procedures and remain in active status in SEVIS.” Id. To
effectuate a continuity of learning, ICE declared that due to the “extraordinary nature of the
COVID-10 emergency, SEVP will allow F-1 and/or M-1 students to temporarily count online
classes towards a full course of study in excess of the limits of 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(6) and 8
C.F.R. § 214.2(m)(9)(v).” See id.
39. Through the March 13 Guidance, ICE enabled students to continue their
education while providing educational institutions the flexibility needed to comply with state and
local health emergency declarations. To date, the United States remains in a state of public
health emergency as daily COVID-19 cases continue to spike. Without a viable COVID-19
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 11 of 27
12
treatment or vaccine, Plaintiff and educational institutions must resort to prophylactic measures,
such as avoidance of indoor gatherings, to reduce the rate of COVID-19 transmission.
B. New York’s Response to the Coronavirus
40. Following the Governor of New York’s emergency declaration in March 2020,
New York State has been in the throes of an unprecedented public health crisis.
41. New York is one of the epicenters of the pandemic and has suffered catastrophic
losses due to COVID-19. As of July 13, 2020, over 401,700 people in the State have tested
positive for COVID-19 and over 24,979 New Yorkers have died from it.
19
In New York City
alone, 215,924 residents have been diagnosed with COVID-19, 55,451 have required
hospitalization to treat it, and at least 18,670 have died from it.
20
42. In response to this extraordinary public health emergency, Governor Cuomo
ordered all schools in New York to close temporarily on March 18, 2020. N.Y. Exec. Order No.
202.4. This executive order was extended several times and remains in effect to date.
43. As a result, most public and private K-12 schools, colleges, universities, and other
educational institutions in the State are closed, with millions of students being forced to learn
remotely.
44. Consistent with CDC guidance and Governor Cuomo’s COVID-19 directives, all
campuses of the State University of New York (“SUNY”) are closed to in-person instruction in
March 2020. SUNY faculty and staff worked hard to quickly move courses online.
19
N.Y. Dep’t of Health, COVID-19 Tracker (last accessed July 13, 2020),
https://covid19tracker.health.ny.gov
20
N.Y.C. Dep’t of Health & Mental Hygiene, COVID-19: Data (last accessed July 13, 2020),
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 12 of 27
13
45. On May 19, 2020, the CDC offered “considerations for the ways in which schools
can protect students, teachers, administrators, and staff and slow the spread of COVID-19.”
21
Per the CDC’s guidance “[s]chools can determine, in collaboration with state and local health
officials to the extent possible, whether and how to implement these considerations while
adjusting to meet the unique needs and circumstances of the local community.” Defendants’
own public health experts declared that “[i]mplementation should be guided by what is feasible,
practical, acceptable, and tailored to the needs of each community.” (emphasis added).
46. The CDC school guidance states, “the more people a student or staff member
interacts with, and the longer that interaction, the higher the risk of COVID-19 spread.” The
CDC identified factors that increase the risk of COVID-19 spreading. Those factors are listed
from lowest risk to highest risk:
a. “Lowest Risk: students and teachers engage in virtual-only classes, activities, and
events.
b. More Risk: Small, in-person classes, activities, and events. Groups of students stay
together and with the same teacher throughout/across school days and groups do not
mix. Students remain at least 6 feet apart and do not share objects (e.g., hybrid
virtual and in-person class structures, or staggered/rotated scheduling to
accommodate smaller class sizes).
c. Highest Risk: Full sized, in-person classes, activities, and events. Students are not
spaced apart, share classroom materials or supplies, and mix between classes and
activities.”
22
21
Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Consideration for
Schools (last visited Jul. 12, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-
childcare/schools.html
22
Id.
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 13 of 27
14
47. Among other health and safety recommendations, the CDC advises schools to
“increase circulation of outdoor air as much as possible,” “space seating/desks at least 6 feet
apart when feasible,” “install physical barriers, such as sneeze guards and partitions, particularly
in areas where it is difficult for individuals to remain at least 6 feet apart,” “[c]lose communal
use shared spaces such as dining halls,” offer virtual learning, “train staff on all safety
protocols,” and “conduct daily health checks.”
23
48. Prior to the issuance of the Directive, SUNY committed many hours and resources
to developing a reopening plan for the fall 2020 semester (the “Reopening Plan”). Each of
SUNY’s 64 campuses developed reopening plans that were responsive to the specific needs of
each campus.
49. SUNY also relied on ICE’s March 2020 waiver regarding the SEVP program in
developing plans for the fall 2020 semester.
50. The Reopening Plan was developed in response to state directives requiring higher
education institutions to develop and submit plans for reopening during the COIVD-19 pandemic.
These directives required that reopening plans address specified COVID-related considerations,
including: measures to ensure appropriate social distancing; plans for the procurement and
distribution of personal protective equipment; and mechanisms for monitoring and tracking health
conditions on campus.
24
23
Id.
24
N.Y. Dep’t of Health, Interim guidance for Higher Education During the COVID-19 Public Health
Emergency (last visited Jul. 12, 2020),
https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/Higher_Education_Detailed_Guideli
nes.pdf; N.Y. Governor, Reopening New York: Higher Education Guidelines (Jun. 22, 2020),
https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/Higher_Education_Summary_Guide
lines.pdf; N.Y. Governor, Reopening New York: Checklist for Higher Education Reopening Plans (Jun.
18, 2020),
https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/Higher_Education_Reopening_Plan
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 14 of 27
15
51. Consistent with the CDC’s guidelines, New York State’s guidelines emphasized
that reopening plans should ensure, for example, that a distance of at least six feet is maintained
between students in classrooms.
25
52. SUNY’s Reopening Plan complied with state guidelines while allowing SUNY’s
campuses to offer some online and some in-person or hybrid in-person/online courses.
53. As the pandemic progresses, New York and its public colleges and universities
continue to take a science-based approach centered on public health. While New York has
permitted some counties that meet public health thresholds to reopen, many public spaces and
parts of the economy, remain under strict guidelines. All schools remain closed at present.
Moreover, New York’s COVID-19 directives remain in place and when residents are out in
public they must maintain social distancing.
II. ICE Reverses its Prior COVID-19 Priorities, and issues its Directive on COVID-
19 and Fall 2020 SEVP Participants.
54. On July 6, 2020, ICE, without notice and comment or any discernible
consideration of outside evidence whatsoever, issued its Directive abruptly rescinding its March
13 Guidance upon which Plaintiff’s public colleges and universities relied (appended as Ex. 3).
Along with the Directive, ICE issued a press release describing “modifications…to temporary
exemptions for nonimmigrant students taking online classes due to the pandemic for the fall
2020 semester.”
26
_Checklist.pdf
25
N.Y. Governor, Reopening New York: Higher Education Guidelines (Jun. 22, 2020),
https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/governor.ny.gov/files/atoms/files/Higher_Education_Summary_Guide
lines.pdf; Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Considerations
for Schools (Updated May 19, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-
childcare/schools.html
26
U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, SEVP modifies temporary exemptions for nonimmigrant
students taking online courses during fall 2020 semester (Jul. 6, 2020),
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 15 of 27
16
55. The Directive provides no safe harbor for schools operating under hybrid in-
person and virtual learning. “Students attending schools offering a hybrid model—that is, a
mixture of online and in person classes—will be allowed to take more than one class or three
credit hours online,” provided that for each student, the school “certif[ies] to SEVP, through the
Form 1-20, ‘Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status,’ that the program is not
entirely online, that the student is not taking an entirely online course load this semester, and that
the student is taking the minimum number of online classes required to make normal progress in
their degree program.Ex. 3. To comply with this requirement, schools will need to issue a new
Form I-20 for thousands of students on F-1 and M-1 visas and do so within 21 business days of
the July 6 Directive. This unduly burdensome requirement disregards that students generally are
not required to register for classes until closer to the start of the semester.
56. The Directive and accompanying news release demonstrate Defendants’ disregard
for the well-being of students, faculty, staff, and surrounding communities by requiring students
to attend classes as a condition of maintaining their student visas.
57. The timing of ICE’s abrupt July 6 Directive also suggests that Defendants are
motivated by political calculations rather than sound education and public health policy. The
Directive is one of various recent efforts by the current administration to compel states to adhere
to the federal government’s reckless push to re-open schools amid a surging pandemic.
27
https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/sevp-modifies-temporary-exemptions-nonimmigrant-students-taking-
online-courses-during
27
Christina Wilkie, Trump Threatens to Cut Funding for Schools, Slams CDC Reporting Guidelines as
Too Tough and Expensive, CNBC (Jul. 8, 2020), https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/08/coronavirus-trump-
threatens-to-cut-school-funding-slams-cdc-reopening-guidelines.html; see also, Collin Binkely, “We’re
Very Much Going to Push Pressure on Governors and Everybody Else.” Trump Pushes to Reopen
Schools This Fall, Time (Jul. 7, 2020), https://time.com/5864008/donald-trump-schools-reopening-covid-
19/; Elena Rabinowitz, I Teach Public School. I Love My Students. I Don’t Want to Die, CNN (Jul. 10,
2020), https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/10/opinions/schools-reopening-covid-19-pandemic-
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 16 of 27
17
58. Kenneth Cuccinelli, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, United
States Citizenship and Immigration Services, recently stated that the July 6 Directive was part of
the federal administration’s efforts to reopen all schools.
28
The July 6 Directive constitutes a
convergence of the administration’s cruel immigration agenda and its efforts to coerce states into
reopening schools amid a pandemic.
59. The Directive’s coercive elements comes in various forms including a heightened-
risk of deportation on students with visas. The Directive states, “Nonimmigrant F-1…students
attending schools operating entirely online may not take a full online course load and remain in
the United States. The U.S. Department of State will not issue visas to students enrolled in
schools and/or programs that are fully online for the fall semester nor will U.S. Customs and
Border Protection permit these students to enter the United States.”
60. Moreover, the Directive orders that “[a]ctive students in the United States
enrolled in such programs must depart the country or take other measures, such as transferring to
a school with in-person instructions to remain in lawful status. If not, they may face immigration
consequences including, but not limited to, the initiation of removal proceedings.”
61. According to the Directive, the “U.S. Department of Homeland Security plans to
publish the procedures and responsibilities…in the near future as a Temporary Final Rule in the
Federal Register.” As of the filing of this Complaint, Defendants have not published any
procedures or responsibilities in the Federal Register.
62. Defendants’ Directive undermines public health by requiring schools to provide in-
person instruction and risk the health and safety of students, faculty, and surrounding communities
rabinowitz/index.html
28
John Bowden, Cuccinelli Says Rule Forcing International Students to Return Home Will “Encourage
Schools to Reopen”, The Hill (Jul. 7, 2020), https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/506248-
cuccinelli-says-rule-forcing-international-students-to-return-home
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 17 of 27
18
and by compelling students to attend class in-person or risk deportation. Defendants, through the
Directive, turn a blind eye to their partner agency’s own expert evidence regarding COVID-19
safety and transmission risks.
29
ICE’s reasoning that the March 13 Guidance was issued at the
“height” of the pandemic, as compared to the status quo on July 6 suggests that ICE believes the
pandemic is on the wane. However, this view is wholly out of step with the national reality,
30
and
runs counter to the public health expert warnings of a second COVID-19 wave in the fall of 2020.
31
III. The Directive harms New York.
63. The Directive harms New York’s sovereign, quasi-sovereign, economic, and
proprietary interests.
A. The Directive harms New York’s economic interests.
64. There are approximately more than 100,000 degree-seeking international students
enrolled in New York State colleges and universities. International students comprise 10% of all
college students in New York State.
65. The State, through SUNY, directly oversees public colleges and universities,
serving more than 700,000 students in two-year, four-year, and graduate programs. SUNY is the
nation’s largest comprehensive system of higher education. SUNY’s 64 campuses include
research universities, heath science centers, four-year State-operated institutions, two-year
Community Colleges, and statutory campuses located at Cornell University and Alfred University.
29
Ctr. for Disease Control & Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Forecasts of Total
Deaths (Updated Jul. 9, 2020), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/forecasting-
us.html
30
Christina Maxouris and Amir Vera, US is Still “Knee-Deep” in the First Wave of the Coronavirus
Pandemic, Fauci Says, CNN (Jul. 7, 2020), https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/06/health/us-coronavirus-
monday/index.html
31
Len Strazewski, Harvard Epidemiologist: Beware COVID-19’s Second Wave this Fall (May 8, 2020),
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/harvard-epidemiologist-beware-covid-19-s-
second-wave-fall
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 18 of 27
19
Alongside the City University of New York (“CUNY”), SUNY provides a public option to
hundreds of thousands of people annually. As of fall 2019, more than 415,000 students were
enrolled in a degree program at a SUNY campus. In addition, there are more than 100 private
colleges and universities in the State that serve over 500,000 students and are subject to the State’s
COVID-19 guidelines on social distancing and reopening.
66. SUNY is the largest employer in New York State, employing over 90,000 people.
SUNY’s Research Foundation (“RF”) is the largest comprehensive university-connected research
foundation in the country. The RF operates over a $1 billion research program focused on life-
changing research across a wide range of disciplines including medicine, engineering, physical
sciences, energy, computer science, and social sciences.
67. Nearly 19,000 students on F-1 and M-1 student visas are enrolled or plan to enroll
at SUNY for the fall 2020 semester, and approximately 6,100 students on F-1 and M-1 student
visas are currently enrolled at CUNY. International students comprise 5% of total SUNY
enrollment. At the University of Buffalo (“UB”) campus, international students comprise 28% of
graduate enrollment.
68. SUNY’s international students come from 177 countries and contribute $656
million in tuition and fees, and millions more in housing and other costs each year. The tuition
paid by international students alone constitutes about 18% of SUNY’s tuition-based revenue (40%
for doctoral granting campuses). This means that each international student contributes more than
three times as much revenue to support SUNY’s operations as the average student. This added
revenue undergirds the funding of higher education for hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers.
69. SUNY, CUNY and New York’s many colleges and universities stand to lose
millions in tuition and other revenue from international students who either withdraw, dis-enroll
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 19 of 27
20
or are otherwise unable to continue their education at New York’s schools due to the Directive. In
particular, SUNY risks losing revenue from the thousands of students who are currently living
outside the United States and may not be able to return due to the Directive’s new mandate. SUNY
estimates that anywhere from 20% to 50% of the anticipated international student population will
be unlikely to maintain enrollment at SUNY as a result of the Directive.
70. F-1 and M-1 students who are unable to maintain their coursework for the fall 2020
semester will be denied the opportunity to participate in internship programs and work allowances
in the fall and into 2021, as these students are required to complete a full academic year of classes
before engaging in work-study programs. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(10). Many of these students are
developing skills in STEMScience, Technology, Engineering, and Math and contribute to
cutting edge research.
71. For example, SUNY employs more than 3,000 international students as research
assistants, teaching assistants, and in other capacities. International students fill close to half of all
graduate research positions on externally supported RF research projects, contributing
significantly to SUNY’s $1 billion dollar research enterprise. This work includes research related
to COVID-19, alternative energy sources, targeted cancer therapies, nanotechnology, 5G
technologies, informatics and data analytics, advanced materials, energy storage, early diagnosis
of Alzheimer’s disease, artificial intelligence, and other critically important topics.
72. The loss of these researchers, as well as other students assisting in research would
be a devastating setback not only to SUNY, but also to the surrounding communities, and the
disciplines in which these students work. At a time when a global pandemic demands investments
in healthcare, medicine, science, technologythe keys to unlocking cures and healing ravaged
communitiesDefendants have callously undermined New York’s collective efforts to meet these
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 20 of 27
21
demands by diverting critical educational resources and disabling the next generation of
professional leaders in New York.
B. The Directive unreasonably burdens New York’s educational institutions.
73. Defendants’ Directive will have a significant impact on the administration and
safety of New York State’s colleges and universities in several respects.
74. Over the last several months, New York’s public colleges and universities have
expended significant financial resources to develop safe educational protocols and reopening
plans. Since March 2020, higher education administrators have spent countless hours researching,
meeting, and planning campus-specific education plans and curricula that account for the health
and safety of their students, staff, and faculty. These decisions on how to proceed with virtual
learning during the summer and throughout the fall 2020 were informed by health and safety
considerations, state and local public health orders, and in reliance on Defendants’ March 13
Guidance.
75. Due to Defendants’ Directive, however, schools must suddenly reverse course and
find ways to provide more in-person course offerings to international students. This sudden change
of plans will strain the already limited resources at schools’ disposal.
76. The July 6 Directive creates a logistical and legal morass should schools attempt
compliance with the Directive’s in-person teaching requirement by August 4, 2020. State
directives require SUNY and other state institutions to operate in-person courses in accordance
with public health guidance, including recommendations that schools ensure that a distance of at
least six feet is maintained between students in classroom environments. The limitations of
SUNY’s physical infrastructure make it virtually impossible for SUNY to increase in-person
course options while complying with these public health directives. Even if SUNY were able to
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 21 of 27
22
add more in-person offerings while complying with public health directives, students who are
already enrolled in fall 2020 courses would have significant difficulty changing their course
enrollments under the unreasonably short timeframe imposed by the Directive.
77. SUNY will have to devote unbudgeted resources to counseling international
students about the need to enroll in an in-person or hybrid course to maintain their visa. SUNY
will also have to devote resources to counseling international students about in-person or hybrid
course offerings that are offered and that will enable students to continue to make normal progress
in their degree program.
78. For schools that choose to offer more in-person classes due to the Directive’s
prohibition on in-country, remote instruction, their students, staff, faculty, and surrounding
communities will face increased exposure to the coronavirus. Schools will also have to allocate
funds for increased frequency of classroom cleanings and for purchasing personal protective
equipment to distribute to students and faculty.
79. Further, because students, staff and faculty will likely rely on public transportation
and other congregant spaces to get to class, the coronavirus transmission risks will be heightened.
Schools in New York City face unique risks in this regard, due to the ridership volume of the New
York City subway.
80. At the same time, schools will have to comply with the new administrative
obligations required by the Directive, including the issuance of new Forms I-20 to their entire F-1
and M-1 student body by August 4, 2020. Last year, SUNY had 18,661 enrolled students who
have F-1 or M-1 visas. Schools like SUNY will be forced to divert financial and administrative
resources to quickly re-issue the Form I-20 to tens of thousands of F-1 and M-1 students. SUNY
anticipates that it will have to devote over 9,000 of hours of additional staff time completing
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 22 of 27
23
recertification of international students pursuant to the Directivecorresponding to $410,000 in
salary-related expenses alone. The Directive fails to adequately consider the full range of
administrative and financial burdens it will impose, nor does it adequately explain why such
burdens are warranted on such a short timeframe, and during a public health pandemic.
C. The Directive harms New York’s ability to provide a safe education to all students.
81. Many international students who are currently outside the United States face
COVID-19 related travel restrictions that prevent them from returning stateside.
82. Students who are within the United States on F-1 and M-1 visas who cannot comply
with the Directive’s in-person instruction requirement will have to return to their home country.
This travel will also be complicated by current travel restrictions, and/or exorbitant travel costs.
83. Many students who travel to their home countries will be putting their health at risk
by increasing their exposure to COVID-19 in transit. Some students, such as those from countries
disrupted by internal strife, civil war, and political insecurity, may even face the possibility of
serious bodily harm or even death due to volatile in-country conditions.
84. Students who manage to safely return home will likely attend classes in different
time zones and will need to secure reliable technology. Administering instruction across countries
with varying degrees of technological and internet access will require significant resources from
New York’s educational institutions. Even institutions with the most advanced technology will
not be able to close the internet access and technology gaps present in some developing countries,
and in the homes of certain students. Higher educational institutions must also confront additional
socio-geopolitical barriers including countries that significantly curtail freedom of speech and
access to unbiased information.
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 23 of 27
24
85. Students who cannot meet the in-person course requirements to maintain lawful
student status will be subject to removal or barred from entering. In so doing, the Directive not
only needlessly traumatizes international students by increasing their risk to immigration detention
and removal but may also force some students to pre-emptively uproot their lives in the United
States, breaking leases and other commitments, abandoning their educational pursuits, paying for
expensive travel amidst the pandemic, and risking spreading or contracting COVID-19 by
traveling to their home countries. If these students fail to self-deport within a certain period, they
risk forced removal which carries the additional penalty of barring their return to the United States
for ten years. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9).
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Administrative Procedure Act Arbitrary and Capricious)
86. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in each of the preceding
paragraphs of this Complaint.
87. The APA provides that courts must “hold unlawful and set aside” agency action
that is “arbitrary, capricious, [or] an abuse of discretion.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
88. The Directive is arbitrary and capricious because it fails to consider important
aspects of the problem, including the resulting harms to Plaintiff’s educational institutions and
communities, harms to international students planning to study in New York State, New York’s
public health priorities towards minimizing the transmission of the coronavirus, and the continued
existence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
89. The Directive is arbitrary and capricious because it fails to adequately justify its
departure from ICE’s prior COVID-19 response.
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 24 of 27
25
90. The Directive is arbitrary and capricious because Defendants’ decision runs counter
to the evidence before the agency, relies on factors Congress did not intend the agency to consider,
and disregards material facts and evidence.
91. The Directive is therefore “arbitrary, capricious, [or] an abuse of discretion” in
violation of the APA. 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
92. Defendants’ violation causes ongoing harm to Plaintiff and its residents.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Administrative Procedure ActWithout Observance of Procedure Required by Law)
93. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in each of the preceding
paragraphs of this Complaint.
94. The APA provides that courts must “hold unlawful and set aside agency action”
that is “without observance of procedure required by law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(D).
95. The APA requires agencies to publish notice of all proposed rulemakings in a
manner that “give[s] interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through
submission of written data, views, or arguments . . . .” 5 U.S.C. § 553(c); see also id. § 553(b).
96. ICE’s Directive is a substantive “rule” under the APA. 5 U.S.C. § 551(4).
97. Consequently, DHS and ICE were required to engage in notice-and-comment
rulemaking before implementing the Directive, which they failed to do, in violation of the APA.
5 U.S.C. § 553(d).
98. New York is harmed by Defendants’ failure to engage in notice-and-comment
rulemaking because it has not had the opportunity to comment on the rescission of ICE’s March
2020 waiver. Defendants’ violations cause ongoing harm to Plaintiff and its residents.
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 25 of 27
26
REQUEST FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
1) Declare that the Directive is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or
otherwise not in accordance with law within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A);
2) Declare that Defendants failed to observe procedure required by law in issuing the
Directive, in violation of 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(D);
3) Enjoin the Department and all its officers, employees, and agents, and anyone
acting in concert with them, from implementing, applying, or taking any action whatsoever under
the Directive;
4) Postpone the effective date of the Directive pending judicial review pursuant to 5
U.S.C. § 705;
5) Vacate and set aside the Directive in its entirety;
6) Award Plaintiff its reasonable fees, costs, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412; and
7) Grant such other relief as this Court may deem proper.
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 26 of 27
27
DATED: July 13, 2020
Respectfully submitted,
Steven C. Wu
Deputy Solicitor General
Daniela Nogueira
Assistant Attorney General
Of Counsel
LETITIA JAMES
Attorney General of the State of New York
Matthew Colangelo
Chief Counsel for Federal Initiatives
Elena Goldstein
Deputy Chief, Civil Rights Bureau
By: /s/ Morenike Fajana
Morenike Fajana, Special Counsel
Carolyn Fast, Special Counsel
Joel Marrero, Assistant Attorney General (pro
hac vice forthcoming)
Office of the New York State Attorney General
28 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10005
Phone: (212) 416-6134
Attorneys for the State of New York
Case 1:20-cv-05349 Document 1 Filed 07/13/20 Page 27 of 27