4
Unit in determining whether a specific individual received credit counseling or debtor education
as represented. However, because individuals obtain credit counseling before filing
bankruptcy, and may choose not to file bankruptcy, the CGS does not record information
concerning the identity of individuals who receive credit counseling, in order to protect the
identity of those individuals. The CGS does collect information concerning the identity of
debtors who receive debtor education after filing bankruptcy, as well as debtors’ bankruptcy
case numbers.
A second common question concerns the treatment of individuals who receive credit counseling
or debtor education jointly. Program regulations require each individual to receive a separate
certificate of credit counseling or debtor education. See 28 C.F.R. §§ 58.22(g) and 58.35(f).
Although spouses may take courses jointly, a certificate listing both spouses is improper.
A third common question concerns the use of a power of attorney (POA) that authorizes a third
party to take credit counseling or a debtor education course on behalf of an incarcerated debtor.
Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 109(h)(4), 727(a)(11) and 1328(g)(2), on motion to the court and a
hearing, a debtor may seek to have the credit counseling and debtor education requirements
waived only in cases of incapacity, disability, or active military duty in a military combat zone.
(Incapacity and disability are defined in section 109(h)(4).) If the waiver is approved by the
court under one of these circumstances, the debtor is not required to take credit counseling or a
debtor education course.
However, since incarceration is not one of the grounds enumerated in the statute for a waiver,
an incarcerated debtor may seek to satisfy the credit counseling and debtor education
requirements by having another person act on his/her behalf, often through the use of a POA.
When a field office becomes aware of an incarcerated debtor who cannot take credit
counseling or a debtor education course because he/she does not have sufficient access to a
telephone or the Internet, staff should encourage the debtor and the debtor’s attorney to attempt
to make special arrangements with the institution for such access so that the incarcerated
debtor can complete the credit counseling or debtor education course himself/herself.
When such arrangements cannot be worked out or when the USTP does not have advance
notice of an issue, then the office should attempt to determine whether there is a valid POA in
place that is sufficient under state law where the bankruptcy petition was filed to permit filing a
bankruptcy petition. In addition, some bankruptcy courts have addressed the issue of whether
a person acting with a POA can take credit counseling or a debtor education course on behalf
of a debtor and have made different determinations. Field offices should become familiar
with the case law in their jurisdiction on this subject and should exercise sound discretion in
deciding whether to move to dismiss a case or to object to the debtor’s satisfaction of the
debtor education requirement based on this and the specific facts and circumstances of the
case. The debtor’s failure to properly disclose that a third party took the counseling or debtor
education course on the debtor’s behalf, as discussed below, may be an additional factor to be
considered by field offices in exercising their discretion.
When another individual takes the credit counseling and debtor education on behalf of the
incarcerated debtor, then 28 C.F.R. § 58.22(o) and 28 C.F.R. § 58.35(m) require that the
certificate evidencing completion of the credit counseling or debtor education course set forth
both the name of the debtor and the name of the individual holding the POA who took the