V. MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATES/REVISIONS
At a minimum, the management plan implementation schedule will need to be updated after 10
years, but in reality, minor modifications and changes to the order of activities often become
necessary well before the 10-year anniversary. The required 10-year review of a management plan
approved in the fall of 2017 should be scheduled for re-approval in the fall of 2027. The revised
implementation schedule begins with year 2028. The plan elements that may need to be revised
are found in the Colorado Forest Agriculture Program Management Plan Guidelines.
VI. ADDRESSING SUBSTANDARD PERFORMANCE
1. With landowner input, determine the reason(s) for non-compliance and how the
landowner can meet the challenge(s). Request that the landowner and their assisting
forester incorporate action items into the annual work plan for the following year.
2. Oral communication should be followed by written communication to ensure that
the landowner, assisting forester and inspecting forester all are on the same page.
The importance of good communication skills and detailed documentation during
each inspection cannot be stressed enough when it is time to not recommend a
property.
3. If any work is completed as requested, praise can go a long way, so make a point of
letting the landowner know their effort is appreciated.
4. If the action items developed with the landowner do not produce the desired results,
determine the answers to the following questions: Is the landowner putting
sufficient time/effort into rectifying the shortfalls? Are there other ways to resolve
the inconsistency between accomplishments and the forest management plan?
5. For a landowner engaged with limited results: A landowner that is trying different
approaches in terms of products and marketing should be allowed to remain in the
program particularly if there is some form of management being accomplished
while developing a new market or researching a different product. “Engaged”
means the landowner is treating their forest endeavors as a business, and not as a
last-minute effort two weeks prior to the next inspection.
6. If a CSFS field office determines that the Forest Ag status is in jeopardy, all actions
required to remain in the program need to be stated in writing, along with the
consequence for not completing the actions being a “no” recommendation to the
county assessor. Do not state any consequences that will not be enforced. When
possible, the presence of the Area Manager at the inspection adds a witness to the
conversation that can be helpful when determining what actions need to be taken to
remain in the program.
7. For a landowner that requests an inspection even though the terms stated in Section
VI.6. (above) were not met, the inspection report will state the date of the
inspection, who was present, the activities that were not accomplished satisfactorily
as outlined in the prior year inspection report, and that, therefore, the property will
not be recommended. The property can be reconsidered for the program when the
management plan is followed. A courtesy copy of the letter should be provided to