MEETING OF THE PORT PHILLIP CITY COUNCIL
8 DECEMBER 2022
19
Some objections raised concern that the site is not well located in relation to public
transport and community facilities and services. The site is located approximately
1.6km east of the Carlisle Street Major Activity Centre and Balaclava train station.
These are both accessible via foot and the Carlisle Street Route 3-3a tram. The site is
also 800m east of the commercial zone on Inkerman Street.
It is considered that the residents would have easy access to day-to-day shopping,
health and recreation facilities as outlined above. Public transport is accessible to and
from the site and bike lanes are close by. It is therefore considered the site is well
located to cater for residents occupying this accommodation.
The rooming house accommodation as proposed provides a clear alternative to
traditional housing stock, by providing a housing product that is likely to be lower cost
and meeting the specific needs of members of our community.
At the consultation meeting held on 21 November 2022, the applicant stated that
students currently reside at the subject site, walk to the corner of Orrong and Balaclava
Roads (a distance of approximately 600 metres) and catch the tram to Monash
University, Caulfield Campus. The applicant also suggested it likely that future
residents of the rooming house will be students and that they have an association with
an organisation that provides students with contacts of rooming house accommodation.
Whilst the ‘type’ of residents of a rooming house cannot be a condition of approval, the
model put forward by the applicant seems reasonable given that international students
benefit from this type of housing.
10.2 Are the following impacts of the intensification of the residential use acceptable?
The following addresses the amenity impacts relating to the rooming house.
10.2.1 Noise and resident behaviour
A number of objectors have raised noise as a concern with the proposed
rooming house. Eleven bedrooms are proposed, and which is comparable to a
typical multi-dwelling site that could reasonably be expected to be
accommodated on a lot of this size, and which may accommodate a greater
number of residents than 13. Residential noise from residential uses (including
rooming houses) is to be expected within any residential zone. There is no
evidence nor planning scheme policy that would indicate rooming houses are
inherently noisier than other residential uses. Furthermore, typical multi-dwelling
sites with any number of residents do not benefit from a manager and an
amenity management plan. Should a permit for the use as a rooming house
issue, an appropriate amenity management plan would be required as a
condition of permit and would address such matters as behaviour and noise.
Refer to condition 4.
Some objections raised concern about resident behaviour. However, as per the
consideration regarding noise, the proposed (rooming house) use is not
expected to result in any behaviour that would be any different to that exhibited
at a single dwelling or a multi-dwelling site, of which it is noted both types of
dwelling are in proximity to the subject site.
The provision of an on-site management plan would ensure appropriate control
of the proposed rooming house and may minimise any adverse impact on the
residential amenity of the surrounding area or any disturbance or disruption to
adjoining neighbours (Refer to Condition 4).