employment or out of poverty for those looking for work but unable to obtain employment in
the first place. The job guarantee would function as a de facto floor in the labor market,
greatly increasing the bargaining position of workers throughout the economy. For private
employers to attract employees, they would have to offer a job that is at least as good as the
one offered by the government.
• The elimination of working poverty. Unemployment is one of the strongest predictors of poverty in
the United States. Households whose usual breadwinners are out of work are three times
more likely to be poor than working households.
The job guarantee would substantially
reduce poverty by eliminating involuntary unemployment and setting a non-poverty wage and
compensation floor in the labor market.
• Improving workers livelihoods as the Federal Reserve manages its dual mandate. As noted above, the
Federal Reserve has a dual mandate—maximum employment and price stability. Through its
use of monetary policy, the Federal Reserve plays a vital role in promoting full employment;
however, monetary policy has proven insufficient for eliminating involuntary unemployment.
Historically, the Federal Reserve has had a significant role in increasing unemployment as a
result of combating any inflationary pressures that may exist in the economy. With a job
guarantee policy in place, the Federal Reserve can conduct monetary policy without
promoting rising levels of unemployment. In this scenario, the job guarantee program can
maintain employment and consumption expenditures while the Federal Reserve employs
monetary policy to reduce private investment in order to cool the economy. Thus, U.S.
workers would be less vulnerable to the Federal Reserve not adhering to their responsibility of
a dual mandate appropriately due to their cultural over-emphasis—a function of their close
ties to the financial sector—on price stability.
• The restoration of local and state tax bases. By providing for full employment, the job guarantee will
increase employment, and therefore expenditures and tax revenues for local and state
governments. Although the job guarantee is designed as a universal program, more resources
will flow to communities that currently have the highest rates of unemployment and
underemployment (presumably because of higher uptake of NIEC employment
opportunities). This will result in increased government resources to better serve their
constituents.
• Macroeconomic stabilization. The job guarantee would function as a robust automatic stabilizer in
the economy, maintaining levels of employment during economic downturns through direct
hiring, and freely allowing workers to flow from the jobs program to the private sector during
economic boom times. While workers may see some decrease in their purchasing power
during an economic contraction, the job guarantee will automatically expand as demand for
employment in the private sector contracts, providing a buffer to incomes and guarding
against major pitfalls in effective demand.
• The provision of socially useful goods and services. During the Great Depression, the Works Progress
Administration (WPA) and Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) were public employment
programs designed to put Americans back to work. The programs were implemented near the
height of the Great Depression, when the national unemployment rate reached 25 percent.