Page 24 of 31
appropriate steps can be taken to safeguard evidence and protect the rights of those involved.
G. Circumstances where the research community or public should be informed. [65 FR 76263.III]
(2) Report other allegations to the OIG when they have conducted an inquiry and determined that there is
sufficient evidence to proceed with an investigation. [65 FR 76263. III]
39. Scientific Integrity Terms and Conditions
The recipient agrees to comply with EPA’s Scientific Integrity Policy
when conducting, supervising, and
communicating science and when using or applying the results of science. For purposes of this award condition
scientific activities include, but are not limited to, computer modelling, economic analysis, field sampling,
laboratory experimentation, demonstrating new technology, statistical analysis, and writing a review article on a
scientific issue. The recipient agrees to:
39.1 Scientific Products
39.1.1 Produce scientific products of the highest quality, rigor, and objectivity, by adhering to
applicable EPA information quality guidelines quality policy
and peer review policy.
39.1.2 Prohibit all recipient employees, contractors, and program participants, including
scientists, managers, and other recipient leadership, from suppressing, altering, or
otherwise impeding the timely release of scientific findings or conclusions.
39.1.3 Adhere to EPA’s Peer Review Handbook, 4
th
Edition, for the peer review of scientific
and technical work products generated through EPA grants or cooperative agreements
which, by definition, are not primarily for EPA’s direct use or benefit.
39.2 Scientific Findings
39.2.1 Require that reviews regarding the content of a scientific product that are conducted by
the project manager and other recipient managers and the broader management chain be
based only on scientific quality considerations, e.g., the methods used are clear and
appropriate, the presentation of results and conclusions is impartial.
39.2.2 Ensure scientific findings are generated and disseminated in a timely and transparent
manner, including scientific research performed by employees, contractors, and program
participants, who assist with developing or applying the results of scientific activities.
39.2.3 Include, when communicating scientific findings, an explication of underlying
assumptions, accurate contextualization of uncertainties, and a description of the
probabilities associated with both optimistic and pessimistic projections, if applicable.
39.2.4 Document the use of independent validation of scientific methods.
39.2.5 Document any independent review of the recipient’s scientific facilities and testing
activities, as occurs with accreditation by a nationally or internationally recognized
sanctioning body.
39.2.6 Make scientific information available online in open formats in a timely manner,
including access to data and non-proprietary models.
39.3 Scientific Misconduct
39.3.1 Prohibit intimidation or coercion of scientists to alter scientific data, findings, or
professional opinions or non-scientific influence of scientific advisory boards. In
addition, recipient employees, contractors, and program participants, including scientists,
managers, and other leadership, shall not knowingly misrepresent, exaggerate, or
downplay areas of scientific uncertainty.
39.3.2 Prohibit retaliation or other punitive actions toward recipient employees who uncover or
report allegations of scientific and research misconduct, or who express a differing
scientific opinion. Employees who have allegedly engaged in scientific or research
misconduct shall be afforded the due process protections provided by law, regulation, and